TL;DR
Get emergency and outdoor gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
The U.S. Congress is moving to nullify a 2025 management plan for Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, risking a rollback of protections. Critics warn this sets a dangerous precedent for public lands nationwide.
The U.S. Congress is actively working to overturn the 2025 management plan for Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, a move that could significantly weaken federal protections for the area. This legislative effort, using the Congressional Review Act, has sparked strong opposition from scientists and conservation groups who warn it could set a dangerous precedent for public lands nationwide.
More than 150 researchers and scientific institutions have formally opposed legislation aimed at nullifying the 2025 management plan, which includes protections for archaeological sites, wildlife habitats, and recreational areas within the monument. The plan was established to preserve the landscape’s ecological and paleontological significance, covering nearly 4,000 square miles in southern Utah.
Supporters of the effort, including Utah Senators Celeste Maloy and Mike Lee, argue that the current plan is too restrictive and that returning management to a more local, community-driven approach is preferable. They claim the move is about restoring local voices and reducing federal overreach. However, critics, including conservation groups like the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, warn that this legislative tactic, known as the CRA, could be used to undo protections across other national monuments and parks, potentially opening them to industrial activities such as mining and logging.
The CRA has previously been employed to rescind protections in other areas, including parts of Wyoming, Alaska, and Montana. Experts warn that once protections are rolled back through this process, they are unlikely to be reinstated without explicit congressional approval, creating long-term uncertainty for public land management. Critics also highlight that the move could undermine years of scientific research and public input, replacing stable management rules with unpredictable and potentially damaging activities.
Why It Matters
This development is significant because it threatens to weaken longstanding protections for one of America’s most ecologically and scientifically valuable landscapes. The potential rollback could lead to increased industrial activity, habitat destruction, and loss of access for recreation and scientific research. It underscores broader debates over federal land management, local control, and the influence of political interests on public lands. If successful, the effort could serve as a blueprint for further reductions in protections across other national monuments and parks, impacting biodiversity, cultural heritage, and outdoor recreation nationwide.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Background
Grand Staircase-Escalante was designated as a national monument in 1996 and expanded in 2017 before being reduced in size by the Trump administration in 2017. The Biden administration restored its original boundaries in 2021, emphasizing conservation. The current legislative push to overturn the 2025 management plan marks the latest chapter in a decade-long political battle over the monument’s protections. The use of the CRA to undo management plans is part of a broader pattern of efforts to weaken federal protections for public lands, often supported by local industry interests and some political figures who favor resource extraction.
“This CRA escalation is not isolated — it’s part of the broader agenda to weaken public lands governance from the inside out and enable the sale of America’s public lands.”
— Chris Hill, CEO of Conservation Lands Foundation
“This resolution uses Congress’s constitutional responsibility to check executive overreach and returns management to a plan that actually listens to the people on the ground.”
— Senator Celeste Maloy
“If the CRA passes, it will cause chaos and uncertainty for a crown jewel of America’s public lands system.”
— Grant Stevens, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
reusable water bottles for outdoor activities
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What Remains Unclear
It is not yet clear whether Congress will pass the CRA resolutions to overturn the 2025 management plan for Grand Staircase-Escalante. The outcome depends on legislative negotiations and political support in the coming weeks. Additionally, the full scope of potential land uses if protections are removed remains uncertain, with concerns about increased industrial activity and environmental degradation.
outdoor binoculars for wildlife viewing
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What’s Next
Next steps include congressional votes on the CRA resolutions, which could occur within the upcoming legislative session. If passed, the protections established in 2025 would be nullified, and management of the monument would revert to previous or alternative plans, possibly involving more local or industry influence. Legal challenges and public protests may follow, and the Biden administration might seek to defend protections through executive actions or judicial review.
portable solar charger for camping
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What is the Congressional Review Act (CRA)?
The CRA is a legislative tool that allows Congress to nullify recent federal agency rules or management plans, effectively overturning them without the need for new legislation. It has been used to undo environmental protections and land management policies.
Why is the protection of Grand Staircase-Escalante important?
The area is a significant scientific and ecological site, containing unique landscapes, fossils, and habitats. Protecting it preserves biodiversity, supports research, and maintains recreational opportunities for the public.
What are the potential consequences if protections are rolled back?
Removing protections could lead to increased industrial activities like mining and logging, habitat destruction, loss of access for recreation, and a precedent for weakening protections across other public lands.
Could protections be reinstated after being rolled back?
Once protections are removed via the CRA, they are difficult to restore unless Congress explicitly authorizes their reinstatement, making the rollback likely to be permanent or long-lasting.
Evergreen bestsellers Picks
bestsellers
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
