TL;DR
Get emergency and outdoor gear delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
A proposed rule change affecting which waters receive Clean Water Act protections is open for public comment through Oct. 9, according to Outdoor Life. American Rivers regional director Adam Schellhammer warns that weakening protections for streams and wetlands could harm water quality and habitat, but the supplied report does not provide the proposal’s text or explain its exact legal effect.
A proposed federal rule change affecting Clean Water Act protections is open for public comment through Oct. 9, Outdoor Life reported Oct. 7, citing concerns from American Rivers regional director Adam Schellhammer that streams and wetlands could lose protection. The supplied report does not include the proposal’s text or specify which waters it would cover, so the rule’s precise effects remain unclear.
The proposal concerns the definition of “waters of the United States”, or WOTUS, the waters covered by the Clean Water Act. In an interview published by Outdoor Life, Schellhammer said a wetland beside a stream may be left unprotected under the post-2023 framework if it lacks a visible surface-water connection, even when water moves between the wetland and stream underground.
Schellhammer argued that such wetlands can act as a filter and sponge, retaining or filtering pollutants before they reach streams and downstream waters. He said filling those areas could affect stream conditions and the ecosystems that depend on them. Those are his explanations of potential consequences; the source material does not present a government assessment or quantify effects from the proposed change.
Outdoor Life says the public comment period ends Oct. 9. Its report describes the proposal as a rule change putting remaining protections for streams at risk, but does not identify the issuing agency, reproduce the proposal, give a docket number or explain how the proposed text differs from current regulations. Those details are needed to assess the change itself.
Potential Effects on Streams and Wetlands
The scope of the Clean Water Act helps determine which waters receive federal safeguards, including controls on discharges and requirements for permits. Changes to that scope can affect wetlands, streams and downstream water quality, as well as people who fish, hunt or otherwise use those waters. The supplied report establishes that the issue is under public review, not that any particular environmental harm has already occurred because of this proposal.
Schellhammer’s concern is that a visible-flow test may not capture subsurface connections that move water and pollutants between wetlands and streams. If the proposed rule changes coverage, landowners, regulators and conservation groups may face different expectations about where federal protections apply. The exact consequences depend on the rule’s wording and implementation, which the source does not provide.
portable water purifier for camping
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From the Clean Water Act to Sackett
The Clean Water Act was adopted in 1972 to regulate discharges into covered waters, Schellhammer told Outdoor Life. The law’s reach depends in part on how “waters of the United States” is defined. The article describes the Act as a major factor in improvements to water quality over the decades, while its interviewee stresses that waterways can connect in ways not visible at the surface.
In Sackett v. EPA, the U.S. Supreme Court narrowed the federal definition of covered waters in 2023. As summarized in the Outdoor Life interview, wetlands adjacent to waterways may no longer qualify if they lack a continuous surface connection. The new public-comment proposal comes after that ruling; the supplied material does not establish whether it is a response to the decision, how it would implement it or whether it would expand or further narrow protections.
“So we wanna protect those areas so that they can work on behalf of the stream and everything else downstream.”
— Adam Schellhammer, speaking to Outdoor Life
water storage containers for emergency
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Proposal’s Exact Reach
The source material does not include the proposed rule’s text, the responsible agency, a docket number or an explanation of the specific provisions open for comment. It is therefore not possible from this material to say which waters would gain or lose coverage, or whether the proposal would change existing requirements for particular activities.
Potential impacts described in the report are Schellhammer’s concerns, not quantified findings about the proposal. The article also does not state how many comments have been submitted, what response the agency has made, or when a final rule might be issued. The headline’s quoted phrase, “should be avoided at all costs,” is not substantiated as a direct quotation in the supplied transcript.
hand crank water filter for hiking
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Comments Close on October 9
The immediate deadline reported by Outdoor Life is Oct. 9, when the public-comment period closes. Readers seeking to comment would need to consult the official agency notice for the proposal’s text, submission instructions and docket; those links and details are not included in the supplied material.
After the comment period, the responsible agency may review submissions and decide whether to revise, finalize or withdraw the proposal. The source does not give a decision timetable or identify a later milestone, so the next confirmed step beyond the comment deadline is not known.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What is the proposed development?
Outdoor Life reports that a proposed rule change affecting the Clean Water Act’s definition of waters of the United States is open for public comment through Oct. 9. The supplied report does not include the rule text or detail its provisions.
What does WOTUS mean?
Waters of the United States, often shortened to WOTUS, are waters covered by the Clean Water Act. The definition helps determine where federal protections and pollution-control requirements apply.
How did the 2023 Sackett decision affect wetlands?
As summarized in the Outdoor Life interview, the Supreme Court’s Sackett v. EPA ruling narrowed federal coverage. Some wetlands adjacent to waterways may not qualify if they lack a continuous surface-water connection.
Why is Schellhammer concerned about surface-water connections?
Schellhammer says some wetlands and streams remain connected underground, even when no water is visibly flowing between them. He argues that wetlands can filter pollutants and affect downstream waters; the supplied report does not quantify the effects of the proposed rule.
When does the public-comment period end?
Outdoor Life reports that comments are due by Oct. 9, 2026. The source does not provide the agency docket or submission link.
Source: rss
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
